<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Name Generators for Naming Ideas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businessnamingbasics.com/namingresources/generators-naming-ideas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businessnamingbasics.com/namingresources/generators-naming-ideas/</link>
	<description>Your source for company naming strategies, tactics and ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:16:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MartinJ</title>
		<link>http://www.businessnamingbasics.com/namingresources/generators-naming-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>MartinJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessnamingbasics.com/?p=288#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Rose:
I agree that automatic name generators are not always fruitful, indeed they can be completely arid for a particular project. Yet, the very next job, a name generator can mindlessly stumble upon just the right combination.

My approach to naming is to compile a long list of potential candidates through multiple sources, including generators. This can lead to several &quot;just right&quot; candidates, and such a long list will stretch your mind and allow you to think laterally. So I use name generators, my hard-copy thesauruses, phrase/specialized dictionaries, software, and comprehensive specialized word lists. I even consult the vast reservoir of house paint and cosmetic shad names. Quite ofter I&#039;ll find the best candidates by combining words from different sources.

So no resource is left untapped in the quest for a near-perfect business name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rose:<br />
I agree that automatic name generators are not always fruitful, indeed they can be completely arid for a particular project. Yet, the very next job, a name generator can mindlessly stumble upon just the right combination.</p>
<p>My approach to naming is to compile a long list of potential candidates through multiple sources, including generators. This can lead to several &#8220;just right&#8221; candidates, and such a long list will stretch your mind and allow you to think laterally. So I use name generators, my hard-copy thesauruses, phrase/specialized dictionaries, software, and comprehensive specialized word lists. I even consult the vast reservoir of house paint and cosmetic shad names. Quite ofter I&#8217;ll find the best candidates by combining words from different sources.</p>
<p>So no resource is left untapped in the quest for a near-perfect business name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rose</title>
		<link>http://www.businessnamingbasics.com/namingresources/generators-naming-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessnamingbasics.com/?p=288#comment-109</guid>
		<description>automatic name generators are never as fruitful as a human brain creating and collaborating. there&#039;s a good article over here you might like : http://onthebutton.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/name-your-company-automatically/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>automatic name generators are never as fruitful as a human brain creating and collaborating. there&#8217;s a good article over here you might like : <a href="http://onthebutton.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/name-your-company-automatically/" rel="nofollow">http://onthebutton.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/name-your-company-automatically/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
