Business Naming Basics » Naming Issues

Company Naming Shouldn’t Lead to Confusion.

MartinJ — Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:40:21 +0000

How often has a name mislead you?

It happens to me quite often. Perhaps it’s because I take things quite literally. Or it could be the name just isn’t relevant to the product. Here are two quite different examples:

The fast-food chain Popeye’s offers Cajun-influenced food – dirty rice and such. Yet the first image that comes to mind for me is Popeye the Sailor Man, and “logically”, seafood.

I don’t know if younger people are even aware of Popeye from the comic strips and animated cartoons of years gone by. There are a couple of food associations for Popeye apart from the obvious seafood image: spinach, the source of Popeye’s strength; burgers eaten voraciously by his sidekick, Wimpy, and even olive oil, an alternate spelling of his girl friend’s name, Olive Oyl. But nowhere in the Popeye mythology is Cajun/Creole/Louisiana cuisine apparent.

So why was the Popeye name adopted? I have no idea, I would not have named the chain with what I feel was an irrelevant, even inappropriate, name.

In another context is the adaptation of the name Dove for chocolate treats. Even though they aren’t in the same product categories, the soap of that name can’t help but “rub off” on the chocolate bars and candies.

Eating soap brings to mind getting my mouth washed out with it after my mother heard me swear as a youngster. Both the soap and the candy are appealing in their own rights, and they’re both aiming at discerning, quality-oriented markets. I also think both are female-oriented. So perhaps only a literal-minded critic like me would think twice before adopting a name that’s been well-branded even in an entirely different product category. But I would certainly think twice or thrice before making such a recommendation.

My point with these examples is that, though they may be successful in their respective markets, I think less confusing, more unique names might have made them stronger still.

I’d like to hear what you think. I’d also wish you to share other examples of names that confuse you in one way or another. Because we learn from mistakes – but they needn’t always be our own mistakes.

Post from: Business Naming Basics

Company Naming Shouldn’t Lead to Confusion.

Related business naming posts:

Don’t Let Business Naming Frustrate You Into a Second-class Name Here are four major ideas that can help you adopt a “killer” name with the least amount of angst. When...
When Naming a Brand, Think Action First. Action words make for better business names. So I recommend exploring participles and verbs to produce vital, active name candidates....
In Name Development, Begin with a Naming Brief Name development starts by determining what’s important in the business name you chose. ...

Naming Basics: Why Companies Shouldn’t Name with Initials

MartinJ — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 00:55:29 +0000

Business naming can be a trend-following activity.

When a lot of company names are just three letters, many think that would be a cool way to name their business. Plus it doesn’t take a lot of thought – not to even mention creativity.

But unless those initials already stand for something that’s appropriate for the company (MVP, QED, ASAP), initials don’t mean a thing to prospects and customers until they have a considerable history with the company. And then the initials have no actual meaning, just an identification – like a part number.

Initials have no personality They don’t resonate. They don’t elicit emotion. They are hard to remember, especially for those just experiencing the name. They don’t differentiate the company. They communicate no passion, history or expertise. They are just initials.

So I suggest going instead with a short, active one or two word name. Even if it’s a coined word name, that’s so much better than lifeless initials.

Post from: Business Naming Basics

Naming Basics: Why Companies Shouldn’t Name with Initials

Related business naming posts:

Business Naming with Three Initials – Bad Branding IBM, RCA, AIG and MSN are recognized corporate names, but I wouldn’t follow their lead when naming a company. That's...
Business Naming with Descriptive Words: A Bad Idea Using a descriptive business name leads to a dead-end for rapidly growing companies. But that’s just one problem when trying...
Business Naming Terminology Helps Identify Name Effectiveness Like almost anything else, corporate names can be classified by type or category. Why would you want to do this?...

Business Naming Posts From Other Naming Blogs – August 11, 2009

MartinJ — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:05:00 +0000

Here are the highlights from a scan of last week’s (Aug 2-10) business naming blogs.

Luxury Brand Naming on Ketchup?

August 11, 2009
- The economy is like a boat in that we all rise and fall with the tide, even stalwards like Tiffany and Rollex.

Greedy Guccis Barred from Using the Gucci Brand Name for Their Product Naming

August 11, 2009
- Oh, what tangled webs we weave!

Why We Love Coining New Product Names From "Twitter"

August 11, 2009

Natural Product Naming Rids Kimberly-Clark of the Kleercut "Brand"

August 11, 2009
- As I’ve said before, naming and branding “green” is no longer a differentiator. Now consumers are expecting products to be responsible – all products. And with the dubious claims for being environmentally friendly just because you’ve gone to a less substantial plasic bottle, no one is convinced of manufacturer claims.

Go Go Godzilla!: Don’t Mess with Toho Co, They Protect Their Mark Fiercely

August 11, 2009
- Trademarks are sometimes difficult for the courts to judge. How far will Godzilla go? Is Filezilla next?

Post from: Business Naming Basics

Business Naming Posts From Other Naming Blogs – August 11, 2009

Related business naming posts:

Business Naming Posts From Other Naming Blogs – August 4, 2009 Company naming, product naming and naming resources covered this week...
Business Naming Posts From Other Naming Blogs – July 28, 2009 Steve Saleen Drives Into a Company Naming Crisis July 28, 2009 - Yes, a clear reason to resist ego-naming...
Business Naming Comments From Around the Web – July 20, 2009 SyFy: Awful Name, Awesome Ad Campaign July 20, 2009 - I must agree that the name is a little...

Business Naming Posts From Other Naming Blogs – August 4, 2009

MartinJ — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 23:49:13 +0000

Company naming, product naming and naming resources covered this week

UNIQLO: A Retail Brand Naming Strategy That Just Works

August 4, 2009
- Is it Uniqlo or Uniglo? I can pronounce the latter, not the former.

All Hail Altegrity! Catchword Sets The Foundation For A New Brand Identity

August 4, 2009
- Well, Altegrity will take some getting used to, as do most coined words. But for me, I stay away from names beginning with “Al”, “At” and “Ad”. There just seem to be too many new company names like that.

Lululemon on the benefits of the letter L

August 4, 2009
- Yes, certain letters and letter combinations can evoke warm or active or cozy feelings. The letter “L” is soft, and when several are in the same name, well, isn’t LuLulemon fun to pronounce?

Free company and product naming

August 4, 2009
- The WordLab is a great resouce – and it’s free.

Radio Shack Name Change Begs the Question: What’s “The Shack?”

August 4, 2009
Including a limiting product noun is short-sighted, even when the scope is 30 or more years.

Post from: Business Naming Basics

Business Naming Posts From Other Naming Blogs – August 4, 2009

Related business naming posts:

Business Naming Posts From Other Naming Blogs – August 11, 2009 Here are the highlights from a scan of last week's (Aug 2-10) business naming blogs....
Business Naming Posts From Other Naming Blogs – July 28, 2009 Steve Saleen Drives Into a Company Naming Crisis July 28, 2009 - Yes, a clear reason to resist ego-naming...
Naming Resources Abound on the Internet Naming Resources come in all sizes and shapes, some free and some with a price. As a professional namer, I've...

Business Naming Posts From Other Naming Blogs – July 28, 2009

MartinJ — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:45:11 +0000

Steve Saleen Drives Into a Company Naming Crisis

July 28, 2009
- Yes, a clear reason to resist ego-naming your company after yourself. All entrepreneurs should take this to heart.

Rebranding Pepsi: The Linguistics behind the "Pecsi" Campaign

July 28, 2009
- Here’s another example of why global branding and naming must be at least reviewed by natives immersed in their cultures rather than by someone in a NYC office with an English-to-Transylvania dictionary.

Wabi-sabi: There’s a Name For It

July 28, 2009
- Yes indeed, words from other languages are certainly candidates for business names. Quite often the sound of these names can communicate attributes of the brand. And there’s also the mystique of a foreign place that can be compelling for some brands. But…you should be doubly diligent about how these words translate into other foreign languages and what they might connote to other cultures.

Saab's Swedish Naming Makes it The Ultimate Anti-Brand

July 28, 2009
- Is there really a trend toward “anti-branding”, or is it smart branding? I believe “being different” is a major component of a good brand. And I think that difference needs to be reflected in the business name, the single most prominent branding element.

Post from: Business Naming Basics

Business Naming Posts From Other Naming Blogs – July 28, 2009

Related business naming posts:
1. Business Naming Comments From Around the Web – July 20, 2009 SyFy: Awful Name, Awesome Ad Campaign July 20, 2009 - I must agree that the name is a little...
2. Business Naming with Foreign Words Can be Powerful Business and product names can carry a certain mystique or even a classy tone if derived from foreign words. But...
3. Business Naming Posts From Other Naming Blogs – August 11, 2009 Here are the highlights from a scan of last week's (Aug 2-10) business naming blogs....

Business Names Plagued By Nicknaming

MartinJ — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:49:59 +0000

Company names reduced to nicknames: that’s a naming trend I’d like to see stopped in its tracks.

I’ve ranted about this before, particularly about the now-absorbed Washington Mutual calling itself “Wa Mu”. Terrible idea. I don’t think their shortening of the business name caused their financial problems, but in hind site, it did demonstrate a lack of management constraint and focus. Anyway…

The newest demonstration of nicknaming just breaks my heart. The guilty party? The venerable National Geographic.

Now first let me acknowledge the name is not “large enough” for its charter, and never has been. But over time most constituents have come to know and accept the brand and what the name stands for without questioning “National” or “Geographic” as being inadequate, largely because they consistently maintained the society’s identity.

The National Geographic Society name and logo

Everyone knows that year after year, month after month the magazine, with its National Geographic yellow and dramatic cover photograph, was (and still is) a great getaway and information source about our planet and its amazing diversity. With the introduction of the TV channel and a select catalog of travel/adventure products, National Geographic has admirably kept pace, and even more importantly, led the environmental movement.

Because of its associations and focus, the brand stands alone no matter what the name says in a literal “translation”. National Geographic is about great photos and writing, about the dangers to our planet, about exotic cultures, about adventure, and about innovative efforts to fund additional exploration and research. Yes, National Geographic is national treasure – no, make that a global treasure with a limiting name.

Never-the-less National Geographic STANDS FOR SOMETHING.

But now, probably influenced by the texting trend, they have seen fit to use a nickname on their National Geographic Channel website. It’s just terrible.

It’s Nat Geo.

Shame on you, National Geographic Society. Shame on you for violating your brand, for diluting your name, for alienating a core segment of your constituency.

Oh, and to make matters worse, on the National Geographic home page, they refer to themselves as “NG” upon occasion. NG? I know that as an abbreviation for “no good”!

Their tagline/mission statement is “Inspiring People to Care About the Planet”. National Geographic is inspiring, Nat Geo or NG not so much.

Perhaps it’s just my age that brings about a prejudice against the “newest thing”, but I’m pretty sure it’s not good branding.

I invite your take on this subject in the comments box further down this page.

Post from: Business Naming Basics

Business Names Plagued By Nicknaming

Related business naming posts:

Naming Idea – Define the Brand Personality Before Naming Your Business Before generating name ideas, I recommend a couple of activities. One is to create a "brand story". The other is...
A Company Naming Trend to Avoid Naming your business using double-e’s and double-o’s are perfectly acceptable in the middle or the end of a word, but...
Business Naming Should be Well Considered Quite often a business name will come to mind, and then adapted by the entrepreneur in charge even before the...

Business Naming Clients Can Be Capricious, And That’s Okay

MartinJ — Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:05:36 +0000

As the owner of a naming company, I must confess that I don’t always hit home runs.

It’s not that I don’t try. It’s just that everyone doesn’t have the same idea of what a perfect name is. Several of my clients are in that category.

Comments that aren't helpful in selecting a business name

Sometimes I will recommend a business name I believe to be a winning name but the client has other ideas. Or to be more accurate, they don’t have any ideas that provide constructive direction. They are just uncomfortable with the candidates I’ve presented.

This happens even though in most cases we have agreed upon naming goals and criteria before I’ve generated naming candidates. I do that with a document called a naming brief.

Most often, I find that clients are uncomfortable with the out-of-the-box uniqueness of a coined word name. But there have been instances when name candidates of any construction just won’t suit them. And usually they find no specific objection. They just don’t feel comfortable with the candidates presented.

Today I attempt to get in sync through the use of a couple of additional questions in the naming brief. (The naming brief is a document I ask my clients to fill out of me. It requires the client think about the purpose and goals for the name, along with other relevant information.) At the end of this document I now ask that the client provide me with five names of other companies that they like and would feel comfortable with. I also ask that they give me business names of five companies they do not like. Also I ask them to divulge any taboos or sacred cows concerning their new name.

This will not eliminate all of the problems in communication between us. But I have found many more name candidates are looked upon with favor.

Many will think it odd that I am not as adamant as some consultants are about their recommendations. But I have found that a company’s name, at least for the company’s CEO, is a very personal, ego driven decision. There is no use trying to sell a client on a particular name if he or she does not enthuse about it.

Using this method has created many more situations where my first recommendation is accepted with enthusiasm.

I adhere to the proposition that the client is right, particularly if it is his company that is being named. I just provide him or her the best options I can invent.

Post from: Business Naming Basics

Business Naming Clients Can Be Capricious, And That’s Okay

Related business naming posts:

Brand Naming Controversies Can Be Stimulating I ran across another blog that presented some advice on business naming. As usual, everyone has their own set of...
Naming Idea – Define the Brand Personality Before Naming Your Business Before generating name ideas, I recommend a couple of activities. One is to create a "brand story". The other is...
Try Naming a Business with Reverse English Business naming can be more productive when you have a great number of name candidates from which to choose. Here’s...

Business Naming By Contest: Another Bad Idea

MartinJ — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:17:53 +0000

Quite often a business owner will ask his employees to help name or rename the business through a contest.

I believe this is a bad idea.

Better stage a race than ask employees to name your business.

There are several reasons for this, the first being that very few acceptable names are produced in this manner. Every so often you will hear a successful name being generated by a contest, but this is the exception, not the rule.

For smaller companies this process can also generate bad blood, or at least hurt feelings if someone’s “perfect gem” is not chosen. And if no name is picked from the pool of contest entries there are bad feelings all around.

So often an entrepreneur will accept a poor name rather than cause poor morale within the organization, and ask him or her self, “Why did I think a contest was a good idea?”

The answer, of course, is not to start a contest in the first place.

Reserve contests for blood drives and the bowling team.

Post from: Business Naming Basics

Business Naming By Contest: Another Bad Idea

Related business naming posts:

A Business Naming Lesson From the School Yard As you’re in the throes of naming a new entity, think about how people will try to twist the name...
Brand Naming Controversies Can Be Stimulating I ran across another blog that presented some advice on business naming. As usual, everyone has their own set of...
Try Naming a Business with Reverse English Business naming can be more productive when you have a great number of name candidates from which to choose. Here’s...

Business Naming with Descriptive Words: A Bad Idea

MartinJ — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:52:32 +0000

Using a descriptive business name, as I wrote yesterday, leads to a dead-end for rapidly growing companies.

But that’s just one problem when trying to morph a description into a corporate name.

Another major problem is that to truly describe a business usually takes at least three words. Not only that, they are usually multi-syllable words. The names are too long and too “intellectual”.

Here are four such company names from the latest list of INC 500 Rapidly Growing Companies:

Advanced Planning Services
Ancillary Care Management
Apex Facility Resources
Assured Information Security

Each is certainly a mouthful. But besides being hard to remember because of word-length, there’s nothing with a spark. Nothing “grabs” you.

And I’ll bet by now stakeholders within and outside the respective companies have resorted to calling the companies by their initials: APS, ACM, AFR, AIS.

And pretty soon, one or more will officially change their name to those initials and believe they’re making a wise choice.

But as I’ve stated more than once (my blog entitled Business naming with three initials – bad branding, for instance), initials have no personality or vitality. The name becomes a liability instead of an asset.

So for a multitude of reasons, descriptive names are bad names and should be avoided.

Post from: Business Naming Basics

Business Naming with Descriptive Words: A Bad Idea

Related business naming posts:

Descriptive Business Names are Dead-end Names There’s a great danger that you will outgrow a descriptive name. The problem is that entrepreneurs don’t see business naming...
Business Naming with Three Initials – Bad Branding IBM, RCA, AIG and MSN are recognized corporate names, but I wouldn’t follow their lead when naming a company. That's...
Naming Basics: Why Companies Shouldn’t Name with Initials When a lot of company name are just three letters, many think that would be a cool way to name...

Descriptive Business Names are Dead-end Names

MartinJ — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:30:53 +0000

There’s a great danger that you will outgrow a descriptive name.

The problem is that entrepreneurs don’t see business naming as a strategic activity. In the beginning, they just want to be identified with an industry or product category by adopting a name that describes their business. They do this without thought to the company’s future.

The last name change I was involved in would have cost the company – a regional construction supply business – around $50-thousand. Because of the expense, they opted to retain their name which identified them as a supplier of industrial staples. So their sales force must continue to explain to prospects that they can also supply re-bar, compressors, and generators even thought the company’s name just promises “staples”.

The solution is to not adopt a descriptive name. How could a company like Go-Daddy that began life selling domain names exclusively grow as rapidly as it has if their name had been ABC Domain Names, Inc.? The major players in hi-tech today have usually adopted coined word names, suggestive names or arbitrary names.

Those names types will require some getting used to by the company founders, and they will need to be promoted before they become household names. But this will pay off over time as they grow out of their original product/service niche.

Post from: Business Naming Basics

Descriptive Business Names are Dead-end Names

Related business naming posts:

Business Naming with Descriptive Words: A Bad Idea Using a descriptive business name leads to a dead-end for rapidly growing companies. But that’s just one problem when trying...
Business Naming Terminology Helps Identify Name Effectiveness Like almost anything else, corporate names can be classified by type or category. Why would you want to do this?...
Don’t Let Business Naming Frustrate You Into a Second-class Name Here are four major ideas that can help you adopt a “killer” name with the least amount of angst. When...